The rallying cry in the business world regarding artificial intelligence seems to be “adapt or die.” Companies should get onto the AI bandwagon or be left behind. This narrative has begun to take center stage, from the boardrooms of Wall Street to the tech hubs in India, mostly through the success stories of AI unicorns and consultants who tout trillion-dollar opportunities. But this headlong rush into AI could go horribly wrong. Uncritical, hasty adoption of AI often brings with it hidden risks: misuse of data, ethical lapses, job upheaval, even public backlash. Ironically, a cautious or measured approach at times can be better than a headlong plunge into something.
Gaurav Bhagat, Founder, Gaurav Bhagat Academy
The Rise of the “Adapt or Die” Narrative
Every technological revolution breeds its slogans, and in the AI boom, “adapt or die” has become the rallying cry. Tech leaders and investors warn businesses they’ll be “left behind” if they don’t embrace AI immediately. In the last two years, generative AI’s viral success created a frenzy. Businesses felt an unprecedented pressure to appear AI-forward. Consultants and banks hyped AI as the next multi-trillion-dollar frontier. In India, the AI adoption drumbeat is loud as well. A 2024 Deloitte survey found 95% of Indian business leaders felt mounting internal and external pressure to implement GenAI solutions. The phrase “AI-first” is common in industry conferences, and even government initiatives like “AI for All” reinforce that innovation imperative. However, the same Deloitte report had a surprise in store: more than half of Indian companies were routing less than 20% of their AI budgets to generative AI-a sign of hesitation beneath the hype. This reflects a key truth: adapting to AI is important, but how you adapt matters more than how fast you do.
The Hidden Risks of Blind AI Adoption
Adopting AI isn’t automatically a win. The integration of advanced AI systems without due diligence may unleash serious negative consequences. The immediate concern is job loss driven by automation. Leaders enamored with AI’s efficiency may cut roles outright. AI into the workplace can backfire, eroding trust and collaboration. Uncritical AI adoption can lead to reckless data practices. Machine learning systems feed on data, and in the rush, companies may use sensitive customer or citizen data without proper safeguards. There have been cases of employees unwittingly leaking confidential information into AI tools, for instance, Samsung had to ban internal use of ChatGPT after engineers uploaded sensitive code to it. Police in Delhi deployed facial recognition AI to find lost children, but later expanded it without legal approval to general surveillance, sparking serious privacy concerns.
AI systems can introduce or amplify bias and unethical outcomes if adopted without proper vetting. A famous example is Amazon’s experimental hiring AI, which taught itself to prefer male candidates and penalize resumes mentioning “women’s” (such as women’s sports or colleges). Amazon had to scrap the biased recruiting tool entirely when it realized the model was discriminating. On the other hand implementing AI rashly can hurt productivity instead of boosting it. Complex AI systems require robust infrastructure, training, and change management. If slapped on to “solve everything” overnight, they often underdeliver or fail.Take generative AI, for instance. The hype led many firms to invest in pilots, but an MIT Media Lab report said a full 95% of the GenAI investments to date have generated zero ROI. In other words, moving too fast on AI can cause expensive project failures and workflow disruptions that offset any theoretical gains.
Hype, Pressure, and the Illusion of Innovation
Why do smart leaders fall victim to blind adoption? A big factor is the hype cycle and the pressure to appear innovative. AI’s hype has been extraordinary. At the peak of the generative AI craze, every business was trying to label itself an “AI business” and cash in on the trend. Tech stock rallies rewarded those who touted AI on earnings calls. Consultants and the media amplified the fear that if you don’t integrate AI everywhere, you’ll be disrupted by someone who will. This environment has led to AI strategy by FOMO (fear of missing out), decisions driven more by anxiety and image than by strategic need.
Another facet is the “adapt or die” narrative’s effect on corporate culture. If leadership broadcasts that “AI is the future” without a nuanced plan, employees might panic or rebel. We saw how Shopify’s CEO demanded staff prove they “cannot do it with AI” before getting resources, sending a signal that everyone must use AI or be considered inefficient. That kind of top-down pressure alienates employees and instills fear. The outcome can be lower productivity, resistance, or even active sabotage of AI projects by people who feel their jobs and autonomy are threatened. Innovation rarely works by intimidation.
Conclusion: Adapt Intelligently, Not Instinctively
The imperative to embrace AI is real, this technology does promise improved efficiencies, new capabilities, and competitive advantage. However, the phrase “adapt or die” presents a false binary. It suggests any adaptation is better than none and that speed is paramount. The reality, as we’ve explored, is far more nuanced. Blind adaptation, leaping without looking, can be more dangerous than thoughtful resistance. The imperative to adopt AI is real because this technology does promise improved efficiencies, new capabilities, and competitive advantage. Adopting AI is not a race, it’s a strategy. The companies that rush in may win the short-term applause, but they will face a long-term fallout from the unintended consequences. Ultimately, it is better to get AI right than to get AI first. One must adapt; dying is not the only alternative. The stark choice now is this: either we adapt with wisdom and foresight, or let the frenzy decide our fate. The answer will determine which organizations leap ahead, and which stumble into the pitfalls of the “adapt or die” fallacy.
-author is Gaurav Bhagat, Founder, Gaurav Bhagat Academy
About The Author
